Please note: An evaluation with less than 5 respondents OR with a response percentage of less than 20% is not considered to be representative, and is therefore declared to be invalid. The lecturer does not need to add feedback in that case.
- Check whether you are in the correct programme environment, which you can see in the top left corner (in the example below, it is Bachelor CIW).
- If not, first navigate to the correct environment (opens in pop-up)
- If you are, you can start adding feedback.
How do I add feedback to an evaluation?
- In the left-hand menu, click 'Evaluations'. The list with evaluations of courses you taught is shown.
- If you think evaluations are missing, you can check whether the filter is set correctly.
Then look only at the evaluations that:
- have the status 'Open for feedback';
if there is a purple block with a number behind it, it means that feedback has also been added by (an)other teacher(s) - are valid.
a valid evaluation has min. 5 respondents AND min. 20% response rate
If you want to review the results of the evaluation and/or feedback from the other teacher(s), do so first. See the manual to viewing results [EN to be added soon, Dutch manual: resultaten inzien] (opens in new window). Then continue with step 6.
- Click on the yellow 'Add feedback' button behind the relevant evaluation.
NOTE: Do NOT use the option 'Send recap'. The recap (to students) is sent by the quality assurance coordinator after the evaluation has been discussed in the programme committee.
A pop-up window will open:
- Select the role from which you want to ad the feedback (Teacher/lecturer).
This only applies if you also have multiple roles within this environment. Otherwise, it will automatically state 'Teacher'. - Add your feedback to the results of the course evaluation.
- The Vade Mecum Quality Assurance in Education states the following:
The lecturer writes feedback for each valid evaluation, in which the good and not so good aspects of the course are reflected upon and in which is indicated whether the lecturer would like to or be able to improve the course in the coming academic year, if there is reason to, and if so, how. Even in the event of the evaluation being unanimously positive, a lecturer’s feedback is desirable (see Appendix 2a). If multiple lecturers are involved in a course, the individual feedback can only be seen by the lecturer in question, the quality assurance coordinator and the members of the programme committee. (Vade Mecum Quality Assurance in Education, sept. 2022, p.12) - The response (feedback) is only visible to the course coordinator (if applicable), the OLC members and the quality assurance coordinator and therefore NOT to students. The quality assurance coordinator provides feedback to students.
- The Vade Mecum Quality Assurance in Education states the following:
- If you can/want to formulate specific action points, fill them in. You can also indicate which action points have already been completed.
- Please do not add any files.
- Finally, click 'Save'.